Is 6800 XT better than 3070?

The 6800 XT is quite the good pick if you’re looking for a good GPU

Updated: Oct 26, 2022 3:44 pm

Table of Contents
Table of Contents

Which graphics card will be the best for you? When the gaming performance is concerned, the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 and AMD Radeon RX 6800 hit what could be called the sweet spot: good thermals, amazing performance, and supposedly reasonable cost.

Are they still desirable options with recent MSRP and street pricing blowing out of control? To address such queries, let’s examine their performance, cost, and other factors. 

With high-performance claims of outperforming the previous flagship RTX 2080 Ti for a significant price reduction, Nvidia’s RTX 3070 was introduced. Radeon GPUs were reintroduced to the high-end competitive market with the AMD RX 6800.

Sometimes, the more expensive RX 6800 performs better. In the first place, Nvidia dominates fields like DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) and ray tracing.

Although AMD has released its own corresponding variations, they still need time to develop. In some games, DLSS can completely change the dynamic.

Even if you only play video games, you should be aware of what’s happening in the crypto-mining industry because it significantly impacts GPUs. Due to its power draw efficiency and close to 60 mega hashes per second, the RTX 3070 has been a popular choice for miners.

Although LHR (Lite Hash Rate) versions have diminished some of the excitement, they continue to sell like hotcakes. Similar mining capability but lower efficiency is offered by the RX 6800, which is often slightly more expensive than the RTX 3070.

The average price will be significantly higher if you include the third-party AIB RX 6800 cards, which have exorbitant MSRPs. The RTX 3070 normally performs better here with DLSS if you want to play at 4K with all the eye candy, while the RX 6800 will be excellent at 1080p and 1440p.

However, we wish the solution were clear-cut. We’d advise you to get the least expensive record you can locate due to record shortages and rising prices. With either GPU, you’ll have a blast; the mid-range has advanced significantly. Just let’s hope that the cost and availability keep up.

Is 6800 XT better than 3080?

These days, finding graphics cards on a retail shelf is like finding a hen’s teeth, so it’s crucial to know what you’re buying. Today, two of the most robust graphics cards currently on the market, the GeForce RTX 3080 and Radeon RX 6800 XT, will square off in a competitive high-end duel.

If you are going to set up camp for a GPU, it better be good, and these two are among the very best in our hierarchy of GPU benchmarks. Let’s compare the two to see which one makes the best decision. 

First to market was Nvidia’s RTX 3080 and Ampere architecture, which brought higher performance levels, quicker ray tracing, and tensor calculations, and greater bandwidth owing to GDDR6X.

A few months later, AMD’s RX 6800 XT and the RDNA2 architecture were released. This was AMD’s first ray-tracing product, and it featured a comparatively large 128MB Infinity Cache to increase adequate bandwidth. 

Both cards are more than adequate—possibly even overkill—for 1080p gaming. The gap between the two cards decreased slightly when the resolution was increased to 1440p, although the 6800 XT continued to lead overall. Even with today’s top GPUs, gaming at 4K remains difficult.

Still, both cards can deliver high-end titles at this resolution with respectable frame rates — for the most part, as long as you don’t mind many games running at closer to 60 fps. Both cards deliver incredible performance at all resolutions.

But, if a winner needs to be chosen, it will be Nvidia’s RTX 3080. It provides significant features like ray tracing and DLSS to improve performance. The AMD needs to add an alternative to the DLSS second generation to improve the quality and performance.

The performance will be essential for many individuals, although the winner and margin of victory can differ significantly depending on the game and conditions. The RTX 3080 is a strong rival thanks to DLSS, and anyone who cares about ray tracing will benefit more from it. 

Is the 6800 XT better than the 3070 Ti?

We have a significant GPU benchmark comparison for you today, this time putting the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and Radeon RX 6800 against one another. We are left with “new” mainstream-priced graphics cards that may be deserving of your consideration as next-gen GPUs come and pricing returns to reasonable levels.

Currently going at around $550, the Radeon RX 6800 may be purchased for only a little less than the MSRP. The RTX 3070 Ti, which is currently in stock and starts at $615, is comparable. Even though the 3070 Ti has twice as much VRAM (16GB vs 8GB), the Radeon has a slight price edge.

However, the 3070 Ti has better ray tracing capability, and DLSS 2.0 is currently more widely supported. As a result, you might anticipate paying less for the Radeon GPU, given those circumstances. Performance-wise, the RTX 3070 Ti and RX 6800 are comparable.

It’s noteworthy that most of the games where the RTX 3070 Ti outperforms the Radeon 6800 use Unreal Engine 4, with notable examples including ACC, Gears 5, PUBG, and Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order.

The Radeon RX 6800 performs admirably in games like Doom, which makes use of the Tech 7 game; Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, which makes use of AnvilNext 2.0; Forza Horizon 5, which makes use of ForzaTech, World War Z, which makes use of the Swarm Engine, Hitman 3, which makes use of the Glacier 2 engine, and F1 22, which makes use of the Ego engine. There are no notable Unreal Engine games.

There are currently very few games where an RTX 3070 Ti graphics card is 15% quicker than an RX 6800 and will cost you at least 15% more. The RTX 3070 Ti is still around 5% slower than the average performance, so you’re undoubtedly paying more for the GeForce GPU. DLSS still outperforms FSR, especially in terms of game support, despite AMD’s efforts to make it better.

Therefore, DLSS is a more significant selling advantage for RTX cards until the games are supported, but not with the help of FSR; or else, they are now more competitive than they were when we last compared them.

The key win for AMD is the enormous 16GB VRAM buffer, whereas the huge success for Nvidia is the greater ray tracing performance. We believe that, given the similarity in cost and rasterization performance across a wide range of games, the choice will come down to whether you prefer a huge memory buffer or greater RT support.