…thanks for this link.
Note the mention of the 200 and M5 series but not the M6 series…sort of makes sense to me–the M6 MkII really is sort of a ‘baby’ R7 with 2-3 year old technology inside. So my guess has been (and written here) is no more M6 bodies from Canon…but perhaps the smaller Ms will move forward.
Think about it for a minute–the refurbished M200 + 15-45 EF-M lens combination (and a backpack thrown in for good measure)…is $350 at Canon…right now. That’s quite the deal, especially when compared to some ‘point-and-shoot’ Canons that were ubiquitous not all that long ago (pre cellphone).
=====
It makes no sense for Canon to abandon the tiny APS-C body market to its competitors.
I own the EF-M 18-150 IS lens (in fact, purchased one for a family member, too)…while a fine lens it is somewhat limited in terms of image quality. But when I use an M camera, I’m prepared to make compromises…size-and-weight compromises.
Some measure of the quandary Canon faces is that the kit lens for the R7 has the innards of the EF-M 18-150 with an R mount! That makes no sense…the R7, I think, deserves the best glass the R mount can offer, right!?
=====
There are two EF-M lenses that really really shine, in terms of these kinds of compromises: the 22mm and the 11-22mm IS lenses.
Both of these lenses work nicely on the ‘large’ M6 MkII…but they also excel on the smaller Ms.
I look forward to evaluating the RS 15-30 lens when it is mounted on the smallest R body.